Bug 30907 - we don't bind java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListSet
Summary: we don't bind java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListSet
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Android
Classification: Xamarin
Component: Bindings ()
Version: 5.2
Hardware: PC Linux
: --- normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: dean.ellis
URL:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2015-06-08 11:37 UTC by Atsushi Eno
Modified: 2017-06-28 17:00 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Tags:
Is this bug a regression?: ---
Last known good build:

Notice (2018-05-24): bugzilla.xamarin.com is now in read-only mode.

Please join us on Visual Studio Developer Community and in the Xamarin and Mono organizations on GitHub to continue tracking issues. Bugzilla will remain available for reference in read-only mode. We will continue to work on open Bugzilla bugs, copy them to the new locations as needed for follow-up, and add the new items under Related Links.

Our sincere thanks to everyone who has contributed on this bug tracker over the years. Thanks also for your understanding as we make these adjustments and improvements for the future.


Please create a new report on Developer Community or GitHub with your current version information, steps to reproduce, and relevant error messages or log files if you are hitting an issue that looks similar to this resolved bug and you do not yet see a matching new report.

Related Links:
Status:
RESOLVED FIXED

Description Atsushi Eno 2015-06-08 11:37:18 UTC
Somehow we are missing this.
https://developer.android.com/reference/java/util/concurrent/ConcurrentSkipListSet.html

Probably due to generics limitation or failed recursive generic argument resolution (bug).
Comment 1 Jon Douglas [MSFT] 2017-06-28 17:00:03 UTC
I believe this was fixed awhile back, I see a "ConcurrentSkipListMap" in the most recent stable version of Xamarin.Android:

    [Register("java/util/concurrent/ConcurrentSkipListMap", DoNotGenerateAcw = true, ApiSince = 9)]

Version Information:

Xamarin.Android SDK 7.3.1.2

Thus marking this bug as RESOLVED FIXED for the time being as I was able to verify this is available.